updates and ILD’s analysis on current topics in immigration law and policy

   ILD blog   

Detention Detention

As COVID Spreads, Advocates Demand Release of Immigrants in California Detention Facilities

The spread of COVID-19 in immigrant detention facilities has detainees, advocates, and elected officials demanding action by state and federal authorities. California is home to five detention facilities, which currently have the capacity to detain as many as 5,000 individuals daily, with thousands cycling through each year. 

Despite ICE’s claims that they would limit enforcement during this pandemic, attorneys continue to see individuals placed into detention at an alarming rate. Of those detained, an estimated 95% are held in facilities operated by for-profit corporations, with a track record of negligence, inhumanity, and placing their financial interests above the needs of detainees or staff. Advocates have maintained that these facilities are overseen by a rogue agency, ICE, and run by private operators who lack minimal standards of transparency or accountability.

Ongoing immigration detention not only further endangers those detained but also greatly adds to the current public health crisis. A nationwide study developed by the Nature Public Health Emergency Collection estimates that coronavirus outbreaks among a minimum of 65 ICE facilities (59%) would overwhelm ICU beds within a 10-mile radius. Outbreaks among a minimum of 8 ICE facilities (7%) would overwhelm local ICU beds within a 50-mile radius. 

What follows is an overview of what is known about the current status of COVID-19 and those detained at each of the five immigration detention facilities in California.

Adelanto Detention Facility – Detention Capacity: 1,940 (Operated by The GEO Group Inc), Adelanto, CA

The Adelanto Detention Facility, the largest and historically deadliest facility in the state, has maintained its notorious status with reports of abuse and horrific conditions faced by immigrants during the pandemic. Reports have emerged of COVID-19 infections in the facility, but due to ICE’s seeming obfuscation, it is unclear how many detained individuals or staff have contracted COVID-19. Advocates have alleged that ICE has secretly banned testing for COVID-19 inside the detention center and may be suppressing the truth as to the spread of the virus inside. 

Detainees inside the facility have alleged that GEO, the operator of the facility, has exposed them to hazardous chemicals. This includes having chemicals sprayed every 20-30 minutes in close proximity and, at times, directly at them.

Those who have been exposed say they have suffered health complications such as rashes, nosebleeds, breathing difficulties, headaches, and nausea, Reuters reported.

Otay Mesa Detention Facility - Detention Capacity: 1,230 (Owned and operated by CoreCivic), San Diego, CA

The Otay Mesa Detention Facility, which holds approximately 1,230 individuals, was the site of the largest outbreak of COVID-19 in the state and, at one point, was the largest outbreak in any ICE facility in the nation, with more than 160 individuals testing positive. Tragically, the facility was also the site of the first detainee COVID-19 death, with 57-year-old Carlos Escobar Mejia passing away from the illness in May

Employees of CoreCivic have gone on record with local news outlets citing inadequate health and safety conditions. Credible reports have emerged that CoreCivic has used violence and intimidation against detainees who have asked for basic supplies for medical safety and hygiene. In one particularly egregious case, CoreCivic attempted to require detainees in the facility to sign legal waivers before providing them with personal protective equipment. Detainees who protested this requirement were subsequently pepper sprayed.

Imperial Regional Detention Facility - Detention Capacity: 700 (Operated by the Management and Training Corp), Calexico, CA

The Imperial Regional Detention Facility is one of the state's largest and most remote detention facilities. The facility had its first positive COVID-19 case in May but has not yet reported increased numbers inside the facility. Imperial County itself has had one of the highest death rates for COVID-19, with only two hospitals serving the entire region.

The facility itself remains a virtual black hole for legal representation, with advocates and detainees noting the lack of legal resources and support for those detained inside the facility.

Mesa Verde Detention Facility - Detention Capacity: 400 (Operated by The GEO Group Inc), Bakersfield, CA

The Mesa Verde Detention Facility is currently the site of the most active outbreak of COVID-19 among all civil detention facilities in the country. Advocates believe there are currently over 50 cases of COVID-19 at the facility. This past week, dozens of individuals tested positive for COVID-19, with a federal judge noting ICE’s “deliberate indifference” to the threat posed by the pandemic and ordering mass testing of everyone inside the facility. 

This outbreak comes after months of advocacy by detained individuals highlighting the horrific conditions in the facility and the potential for COVID-19 outbreaks. According to individuals inside the facility, the exposure to COVID-19 is the direct result of recent transfers from individuals who were previously in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), including individuals who had previously tested positive for COVID-19. The policy of facilitating transfers from CDCR into ICE custody is in direct contradiction to Centers for Disease and Control Prevention (“CDC”) guidance, yet it has continued during this pandemic despite a months-long campaign targeting Governor Newsom to end the voluntary practice. 

Yuba County Jail - ICE Detention Capacity: 210 (Operated by the Yuba County Sheriff's Office), Marysville, CA

The Yuba County Jail is the only non-private facility in the state that holds ICE detainees. The facility holds ICE detainees alongside those in county custody and presents an extremely high risk for COVID-19. The jail has been under a consent decree for over 41 years to improve conditions and disability access at the jail, and today, conditions today remain oppressive. 

Advocates have been told that detained individuals are on lockdown 19 hours a day and that there is at least one confirmed case of COVID-19 at this facility. The jail administrators have acknowledged not having enough masks or proper protective gear for those inside the facility despite being paid millions by ICE to house detainees. Detainees inside the facility have staged numerous actions and hunger strikes to shed light on the conditions they face. They have expressed an alarming lack of hygiene supplies, including soap. Detainees are confined in crowded and unsanitary conditions and are unable to maintain safe social distancing. The facility has historically been plagued by sanitation, cleanliness, and welfare issues. 

Conclusion 

There is a high probability that COVID-19 will soon be officially confirmed in every immigrant detention facility in California. It is not a question of if but when these facilities will be further infected and of how many people will suffer and possibly die. 

Detention facilities are structurally incapable of providing any meaningful form of social distancing, with multiple individuals confined to a single room or cell and often dozens of individuals living in a shared pod. ICE itself relies on a detention system in which individuals facing deportation or removal may be transferred between multiple facilities quickly and without oversight. The current structure and operations of these facilities within California enable the rapid spread of this deadly disease. Moreover, as deportations from detention centers continue, the US immigration detention system is directly contributing to the further spread of COVID-19, not just within our nation’s border but throughout the world.

Read More
Detention Detention

AB 32 Ruling May Change Immigrant Detention Forever

A federal court in San Diego is set to rule on a case involving the use of private detention facilities, with broad implications for immigrants in detention in California and perhaps nationwide. 

The suit initiated by the GEO Group Inc., one of the largest private prison companies in the world, was brought against the state of California when it passed AB 32, a groundbreaking bill that banned the operation of all private detention facilities within its border, including private civil detention facilities used by the federal government to house immigrants. GEO was joined in the suit by the federal government, with both parties claiming that AB 32 is an unconstitutional overreach by the state of California, and asked the court to invalidate the law and also declare current contracts in place for facilities as valid and immune from challenge.

The law prohibits private operators from signing any new contracts after January 1, 2020. Advocates allege that ICE and private prison companies colluded to sign 15-year contracts weeks before the ban was set to take effect in an effort to skirt the law. The contracts have drawn criticism, including an oversight letter signed by more than 20 congressional representatives. 

During the first hearing in the case, U.S. District Judge Janis Sammartino issued a tentative ruling in favor of the state of California and appeared inclined to largely uphold the law. She referred to the lawsuit as “fascinating and complex” and noted that more than 100 members of the public had called in to listen to the hearing. 

A finding that AB 32 is constitutional would serve as a severe blow to the private prison industry, which operates multiple facilities in the state of California, including four out of the five immigrant detention facilities in the state. 

A finding that a ban of this sort is constitutional may have even broader implications for the future of immigrant detention nationwide, as more than half of all immigrants in ICE custody are held in private facilities.

As Jordan Wells, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, told the LA Times. “The ruling is as much about ICE’s private prison enterprise across the country as it is about the ban on it here in California,” he said. “Because if California can do it, then other states can as well.”

Immigrant Legal Defense (ILD) and Immigrant Defense Advocates (IDA) had submitted an Amicus Brief to the court ahead of this hearing and were invited by the Judge to present on the case. The brief, which was filed in March of this year, centers on the GEO Group’s documented history of undue influence and bad-faith dealings in the state of California.

Jackie Gonzalez, attorney for Immigrant Defense Advocates, represented both parties before the court. The following is an excerpt from her court presentation; you can read the full statement here.

It is directly against the public interest to allow private corporations to enter into sham contracts with local governments in order to circumvent federal and state laws all while evading oversight and transparency.

By circumventing the contracting laws that they are supposed to follow, GEO and the federal government have undermined the federal contracting process. Because GEO and the federal government have thus far refused to release any information about the formation of these contracts the public cannot be sure that there are not improper motives, illicit financial incentives or other malfeasance that contravene the public interest – and there is ample evidence to suggest that all of these things have occurred.

That is why we are here today and why we filed our brief. To show the court that GEO appears before you with unclean hands, and to point out just how many instances of inequitable conduct have been documented – even without the opportunity to conduct meaningful discovery on this matter.

...

I would like to leave you with one last thought: AB 32 was an expression of our State’s priorities, which value people over profits. We ask that you do not reward the bad faith conduct of a private corporation that subverts the rule of law, our democratic institutions and most importantly human life in its pursuit for profit.

A written ruling on the case is expected in the coming weeks. 

Read More